netdev - Re: Zynq macb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:46:49 -0700
From:	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To:	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
CC:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Anirudha Sarangi <anirudh@...inx.com>,
	Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri 
	<punnaiah.choudary.kalluri@...inx.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Zynq macb

On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 06:37AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 03/13/2014 11:33 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 03:16PM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >> Hi Nicolas,
> >>
> >> I did some testing on the current linux-next tree and ran iperf on Zynq.
> >> It seems that network and even the whole system can collapse when doing
> >> that.
> >> I don't really know what's going on, but once I saw the message:
> >> 	"inconsistent Rx descriptor chain"
> >> printed twice (system frozen afterwards).
> >>
> >> I don't know what exactly is going wrong, but suspect something around
> >> memory/DMA. I have no clue whether it makes any sense or not, but I
> >> tried using the macb_* functions instead of the gem_* ones (see diff below).
> >> That seems to result in a stable system and working Ethernet.
> > 
> > That was a little too early. After roughly 25 minutest the system runs
> > into a deadlock:
> >   BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#1, iperf/774
> >    lock: 0xeda0366c, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: swapper/0/0, .owner_cpu: 0
> >   CPU: 1 PID: 774 Comm: iperf Tainted: G        W    3.14.0-rc6-next-20140312-xilinx-dirty #41
> >   [<c00153c0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0011e70>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
> >   [<c0011e70>] (show_stack) from [<c03d6b50>] (dump_stack+0x80/0xcc)
> >   [<c03d6b50>] (dump_stack) from [<c00670ac>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0xd4/0x190)
> >   [<c00670ac>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c03dc79c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x58/0x64)
> >   [<c03dc79c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c02b0810>] (macb_start_xmit+0x24/0x2d0)
> >   [<c02b0810>] (macb_start_xmit) from [<c0321b10>] (dev_hard_start_xmit+0x334/0x470)
> >   [<c0321b10>] (dev_hard_start_xmit) from [<c0339aa8>] (sch_direct_xmit+0x78/0x2f8)
> >   [<c0339aa8>] (sch_direct_xmit) from [<c0321f60>] (__dev_queue_xmit+0x314/0x704)
> >   [<c0321f60>] (__dev_queue_xmit) from [<c034cb3c>] (ip_finish_output+0x6c4/0x894)
> >   [<c034cb3c>] (ip_finish_output) from [<c034cf24>] (ip_local_out+0x74/0x90)
> >   [<c034cf24>] (ip_local_out) from [<c034d340>] (ip_queue_xmit+0x400/0x5c4)
> >   [<c034d340>] (ip_queue_xmit) from [<c03634b8>] (tcp_transmit_skb+0xa18/0xab0)
> >   [<c03634b8>] (tcp_transmit_skb) from [<c035856c>] (tcp_recvmsg+0x92c/0xae4)
> >   [<c035856c>] (tcp_recvmsg) from [<c03806f0>] (inet_recvmsg+0x1c0/0x1fc)
> >   [<c03806f0>] (inet_recvmsg) from [<c030769c>] (sock_recvmsg+0x7c/0x98)
> >   [<c030769c>] (sock_recvmsg) from [<c0309988>] (SyS_recvfrom+0x9c/0x108)
> >   [<c0309988>] (SyS_recvfrom) from [<c0309a08>] (sys_recv+0x14/0x18)
> >   [<c0309a08>] (sys_recv) from [<c000ea60>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x48)
> 
> Do you have this change in your tree?
> https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/commit/1a85939af40acca2bf963407b497cc31c303ff3e
> 
> I don't think we have sent this to mainline yet.

If it's not in next, it wasn't in my kernel.

	Sören


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html