netdev - RE: [net-next 01/16] ixgbe: add check for netif_carrier_ok in ixgbe_xmit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87618083B2453E4A8714035B62D679924FF2B3CF@FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Sat, 15 Mar 2014 00:24:02 +0000
From:	"Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
	"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
	"asharma@...com" <asharma@...com>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [net-next 01/16] ixgbe: add check for netif_carrier_ok in
 ixgbe_xmit_frame

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:ben@...adent.org.uk]
>Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 5:19 PM
>To: David Miller
>Cc: Tantilov, Emil S; Kirsher, Jeffrey T;
>netdev@...r.kernel.org; gospo@...hat.com;
>sassmann@...hat.com; asharma@...com; stable@...r.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [net-next 01/16] ixgbe: add check for
>netif_carrier_ok in ixgbe_xmit_frame
>
>On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 17:51 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
>> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:19:38 +0000
>>
>> > That would work, but what if there are other callers of
>> > ndo_start_xmit that don't have this check? Handling this in the
>> > driver takes care of all instances.
>>
>> netif_carrier_off() is supposed to stop traffic from flowing to
>> the device.
>>
>> The qdisc layer should be honoring this property, and my
>> suspicion is that it is just netpoll operates in the unique
>> environment that doesn't.
>
>There is no check for netif_carrier_ok() in the qdisc transmit path.
>Instead netif_carrier_off() eventually causes link_watch to call
>dev_deactivate() which installs the noop qdisc.
>
>It does seem like transmitters that bypass the qdisc should
>be checking netif_carrier_ok(), but drivers must also accept that the
>effect of netif_carrier_off() is not immediate.
>
>Maybe ixgbe is not calling netif_stop_all_queues() at quite
>the right time?

You're probably right. I'm looking into it.

Thanks,
Emil

>
>Ben.
>
>--
>Ben Hutchings
>When you say `I wrote a program that crashed Windows',
>people just stare ...
>and say `Hey, I got those with the system, *for free*'. -
>Linus Torvalds