netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Replace u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh to u64_stats_fetch_begin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140314.224112.1327634842494982777.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 14 Mar 2014 22:41:12 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, romieu@...zoreil.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, mpm@...enic.com,
	satyam.sharma@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Replace u64_stats_fetch_begin_bh to
 u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq

From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:26:42 -0700

> Replace the bh safe variant with the hard irq safe variant.
> 
> We need a hard irq safe variant to deal with netpoll transmitting
> packets from hard irq context, and we need it in most if not all of
> the places using the bh safe variant.  
> 
> Except on 32bit uni-processor the code is exactly the same so don't
> bother with a bh variant, just have a hard irq safe variant that
> everyone can use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>

This looks great.

I'm going to apply this to the net-next tree, I hope the block folks
don't mind.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html