[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k3bwqgf7.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:39:08 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: stephen@...workplumber.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, mpm@...enic.com,
satyam.sharma@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] netpoll: Cleanup received packet processing
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:30:14 -0700
>
>> This is the long-winded, careful, and polite version of removing the netpoll
>> receive packet processing.
>>
>> First I untangle the code in small steps. Then I modify the code to not
>> force reception and dropping of packets when we are transmiting a packet
>> with netpoll. Finally I move all of the packet reception under
>> CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP and delete CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP.
>>
>> If someone wants to do a stable backport it would take backporting
>> the first 18 patches that handle the budget == 0 in the networking
>> drivers, and the first 5 of these patches.
>>
>> If anyone wants to resurrect netpoll packet reception someday it should
>> just be a matter of reverting the last patch.
>
> This looks great, but it doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, please
> respin.
Doh! It looks like I dropped the first patch by accident.
Resend coming up.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists