[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874n2znu25.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 12:25:06 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, mpm@...enic.com, satyam.sharma@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 16/16] sfc: Don't receive packets when the napi budget == 0
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> writes:
> On Sat, 2014-03-15 at 17:23 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
>> The Solarflare hardware provides generic event queues for RX and TX
>> completions, link changes, errors, etc. The driver can't process TX
>> completions without going through all the other events mixed in with
>> them.
>>
>
> ndo_poll_controller() could process all events, and queue incoming
> packets through netif_rx().
>
> Nobody cares about performance in this path.
I made this change so that we don't process rx packets in hard irq
context and cause things to break, and I made the most minimal most
obvious change I could.
queueing incoming packets with trough netif_rx sounds elegant.
The practical challenge is that there might be napi bottom halves
already scheduled to run before ndo_poll_controller is called so even
if ndo_poll_controller processes all of the events and calls netif_rx
to deal with the incoming packets the napi bottom halves will have to
still not process the queues when they are called.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists