[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140317142356.GA26584@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:23:56 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 36/38] netfilter: connlimit: use keyed locks
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 13:42 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
> >
> > connlimit currently suffers from spinlock contention, example for
> > 4-core system with rps enabled:
>
> > +#define CONNLIMIT_SLOTS 256
> > +#define CONNLIMIT_LOCK_SLOTS 32
>
> 32 spinlocks use 2 cache lines (assuming 4 bytes per spinlock, and 64
> bytes cache lines)
>
> So I guess this probably should be increased to have less false sharing.
True, Jesper pointed out the same thing to me.
> I believe this hash table of spinlocks could be global, not in each
> struct xt_connlimit_data.
Good point. Indeed, this can be global. I did not increase it
since more locks than tree slots is illegal (need exclusive access to
each rtree at this time). I guess we could align it or increase number
of lock and rbtree slots (after moving lock slots out of connlimit
data).
Thanks for the heads-up Eric, I'll see about addressing this later this
week if noone beats me to it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists