netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/3] The huawei_cdc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:46:11 +0100 (CET)
From:	Enrico Mioso <mrkiko.rs@...il.com>
To:	Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
cc:	Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@....fi>,
	Thomas Schäfer <tschaefer@...nline.de>,
	Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/3] The huawei_cdc_ncm driver / E3276
 problem

I admite you, Bjorn: that's talent.
Let's see how it goes.
And congratulations to Pasik also.

On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Bjørn Mork wrote:

==Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:23:22
==From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
==To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@....fi>
==Cc: Thomas Schäfer <tschaefer@...nline.de>, Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>,
==    netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
==    Enrico Mioso <mrkiko.rs@...il.com>, Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
==Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/3] The huawei_cdc_ncm driver / E3276 problem
==
==Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@....fi> writes:
==> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 02:15:23PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
==>
==>> I still don't know for sure, but I do hope this bug is the real cause of
==>> the problems you are having.  I'll send you a patch for testing as soon
==>> as it is ready.
==>> 
==>
==> Sure. I'll be happy to test the patch!
==
==I ended up with a simple revert of the buggy commit, except for a
==conflict due to unrelated context changes.  This seemed like the
==cleanest approach given that this fix also needs to go to stable.
==
==Attaching the first version.  Please give it a try if you can. I've
==tested it somewhat myself and it doesn't seem to break anything.  Since
==it's a simple revert, there isn't really that much that could go wrong
==here...
==
==
==Bjørn
==
==