[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140317180510.GC15708@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:05:10 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha@...akura.in>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] exit: move check_stack_usage() to the end of do_exit()
It is not clear why check_stack_usage() is called so early and
thus it never checks the stack usage in, say, exit_notify() or
flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint() or other functions which are only
called by do_exit().
Move the callsite down to the last preempt_disable/schedule.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/exit.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 5d5b472..6d1f245 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -788,7 +788,6 @@ void do_exit(long code)
disassociate_ctty(1);
exit_task_namespaces(tsk);
exit_task_work(tsk);
- check_stack_usage();
exit_thread();
/*
@@ -842,6 +841,7 @@ void do_exit(long code)
validate_creds_for_do_exit(tsk);
+ check_stack_usage();
preempt_disable();
if (tsk->nr_dirtied)
__this_cpu_add(dirty_throttle_leaks, tsk->nr_dirtied);
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists