[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D0F6E0472@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:22:45 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Balakumaran Kannan' <kumaran.4353@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuznet@....inr.ac.ru" <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org" <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
"kaber@...sh.net" <kaber@...sh.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net : Remove unnecessary assignments
From: Behalf Of Balakumaran Kannan
> Remove unnecessary assignments
>
> Signed-off-by: Balakumaran Kannan <kumaran.4353@...il.com>
> ---
> Some unnecessary assignments has been removed from devinet_ioctl function.
> The 'ret' variable is set in multiple places, but used only based on if
> conditions. So keeping the assignment inside if will be a better.
...
These all seem to be this transform:
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> dev = __dev_get_by_name(net, ifr.ifr_name);
> - if (!dev)
> + if (!dev) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> goto done;
> + }
I bet that if you look at the generated code you'll find
that the compiler generates the same code for both forms
and is likely to generate the equivalent of:
dev = __dev_get_by_name(net, ifr.ifr_name);
ret = -ENODEV;
if (!dev)
goto done;
So this is just a matter of style.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists