lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:38:32 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	cwang@...pensource.com
Cc:	ebiederm@...ssion.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, mpm@...enic.com, satyam.sharma@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] netpoll: Don't allow on devices that perform their
 own xmit locking

From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:26:54 -0700

> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Eric W. Biederman
> <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>>
>> There are strong and reasonable assumptions in the netpoll code that the
>> transmit code for network devices will not perform their own locking,
>> that can easily lead to deadlock if the assumptions are violated.
>>
>> Document those assumptions by verifying the network device on which
>> netpoll is enabled does not have NETIF_F_LLTX set in netdev->features.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>> ---
>>  net/core/netpoll.c |    1 +
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
>> index 825200fcb0ff..a9abb195a2c3 100644
>> --- a/net/core/netpoll.c
>> +++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
>> @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ int __netpoll_setup(struct netpoll *np, struct net_device *ndev)
>>         INIT_WORK(&np->cleanup_work, netpoll_async_cleanup);
>>
>>         if ((ndev->priv_flags & IFF_DISABLE_NETPOLL) ||
>> +           (ndev->features & NETIF_F_LLTX) ||
>>             !ndev->netdev_ops->ndo_poll_controller) {
>>                 np_err(np, "%s doesn't support polling, aborting\n",
>>                        np->dev_name);
> 
> Hmm? This basically disables netpoll on a lots of devices, such as vlan.

Right, this is bogus.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ