lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1395115400.9114.26.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:03:20 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
Cc:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Li Yu <bingtian.ly@...bao.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Bruce Brutus Curtis <brutus@...gle.com>,
	Weiping Pan <panweiping3@...il.com>, tmorvai@...il.com
Subject: Re: What's the status of TCP friends?

On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 11:13 +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:

> That sounds great!  But it might not satisfy our requirement.  If we use
> AF_UNIX our program will not be deployed on two servers.  Meanwhile
> AF_INET has been applied in our program to communicate with other
> clients.  So DGRAM seems that it is not a good idea.  Now our program
> needs a IPC mechansim that can commnucate between two servers and
> provide a high performance when two processes are run on the same
> server.  That is the reason why I am interested in TCP friends.  :)

TCP friends is another layer added into TCP stack, for what ?

Improving performance for lazy applications ?

Really, if you cared about performance, you would have added a way to
use fast IPC if available.

TCP friends will still be slower than the available IPC mechanisms, by
an order of magnitude.

So instead of spending time on this TCP friends dream, I think you
should focus on existing and supported mechanisms.

I for example could add zerocopy support to AF_UNIX, if you think its
worth it.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ