[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140319.154649.1043650085697557640.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 15:46:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mike.rapoport@...ellosystems.com
Cc: dlstevens@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: vxlan: fix crash when interface is created
with no group
From: Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@...ellosystems.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 09:14:46 +0200
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:55:16AM -0600, David Stevens wrote:
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to:
>>
>> 1) make sure all of vxlan_dev is initialized before use,
>> especially default_dst
>> 2) change the v6 code to check for AF_INET6 too, and do
>> nothing if not set. If not set by the admin, the family of
>> default_dst would then be AF_UNSPEC and not match.
>
> The family of default dst is implicitly initailized to AF_UNSPEC because
> if kzalloc :)
>
> I agree that explicit check for AF_INET6 is much better than fallthrough
> with simple 'else' clause and I can send a patch that makes the checks
> for IPv6 as well as default_dst initialization explicit
>
> However, for the particular case in vxlan_rcv, checking the packet
> version seems to me semantically more correct than comparing default_dst
> protocol family with AF_INET or AF_INET6.
The way I read things, we would receive packets unconditionally in the
pre-ipv6-support code. So we have to keep doing so.
Therefore we either have to check the SKB protocol or pass an explicit
protocol as an argument to vs->rcv(...).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists