lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANEJEGtZF30=bqkErvi1CFZLbk=PJ-p_gKf9eBGU7sWwJcrefg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:58:41 -0700
From:	Grant Grundler <grundler@...gle.com>
To:	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Freddy Xin <freddy@...x.com.tw>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	Allan Chou <allan@...x.com.tw>,
	Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: usbnet: driver_info->stop required to stop USB interrupts?

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Grant Grundler <grundler@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org> wrote:
>> I think a better place for this would be in usbnet_probe() (together
>> with all the other dev->xxx initialization).
>
> Definitely better.
>
> @@ -1536,6 +1536,7 @@ usbnet_probe (struct usb_interface *udev, const struct usb
>         dev->driver_name = name;
>         dev->msg_enable = netif_msg_init (msg_level, NETIF_MSG_DRV
>                                 | NETIF_MSG_PROBE | NETIF_MSG_LINK);
> +       init_waitqueue_head(&dev->wait);
>         skb_queue_head_init (&dev->rxq);
>         skb_queue_head_init (&dev->txq);
>         skb_queue_head_init (&dev->done);

Oliver,
So even with this additional change to usbnet_probe, the device is
reporting a link but can't transmit packets.
I've tried with three different USB dongles (AX88178, AX88772B, SMSC75xx).

In the last case, I ran "ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.100" and then tried
to ping 192.168.1.1. "ifconfig eth0" then reports "RX packets 0 bytes
0" and "TX packets 0 bytes 10796". The TX packets != bytes seems odd
and suggests (to me) that data getting discarded someplace in the
stack. I confirmed by running tcpdump on the other end of the link
(192.168.1.1 side) and got nothing from 192.168.1.100.

I believe the "10796" TX bytes is due to the connection manager
"trying really hard" to get an IP address (via DHCP).

Your patch looks like it should work. But it's missing something and I
don't have a clue what it is. Ideas?

cheers,
grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ