[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANEJEGu3j4a6LOiyD-Qbs5nX4wc4spWQB3ZukmEa1J6VPUg+=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:35:23 -0700
From: Grant Grundler <grundler@...gle.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Freddy Xin <freddy@...x.com.tw>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Allan Chou <allan@...x.com.tw>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: usbnet: driver_info->stop required to stop USB interrupts?
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de> wrote:
...
> I have an idea. Could you test this patch?
...
> - if (dev->wait) {
..
> + if (waitqueue_active(&dev->wait)) {
Yes - building new image now (and transfer to USB and boot from USB).
Should know in an hour or so (doing other things in parallel).
I was sure the problem is in usbnet_bh() since that's the only code
change I'm actually exercising (so far). The way I was reading the
code, we might see extra wake_up calls...but there is clearly more
going on.
Can you please explain why we need to check if the waitqueue is active?
This patch should also add a comment to hint why waitqueue_active()
must be called.
Why? Several experienced people looked at the code and didn't see the
problem including the original author of the patch.
thanks,
grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists