[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1395408778.6441.2.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:32:58 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"H.K. Jerry Chu" <hkchu@...gle.com>,
Michael Dalton <mwdalton@...gle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] csum experts, csum_replace2() is too expensive
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 05:50 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Or the fact that we mix 16 bit stores and 32bit loads ?
>
> iph->tot_len = newlen;
> iph->check = 0;
> iph->check = ip_fast_csum(iph, 5);
Yep definitely. Using 16 bit loads in ip_fast_csum() totally removes the
stall. I no longer see inet_gro_complete() in perf top...
+ if (__builtin_constant_p(ihl) && ihl == 5) {
+ asm(" movw (%[iph]), %w[sum]\n" /* ihl/version/tos */
+ " addw 2(%[iph]), %w[sum]\n" /* tot_len */
+ " adcw 8(%[iph]), %w[sum]\n" /* ttl/protocol */
+ " adcw 10(%[iph]), %w[sum]\n" /* check */
+ " adcl 4(%[iph]), %[sum]\n" /* id/frag_off */
+ " adcl 12(%[iph]), %[sum]\n" /* saddr */
+ " adcl 16(%[iph]), %[sum]\n" /* daddr */
+ " adcl $0, %[sum]\n"
+ : [sum] "=r" (sum)
+ : [iph] "r" (iph)
+ );
+ return csum_fold(sum);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists