[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF1J0HPE9L1Z4xst9ap_Z8nQ9k-N-UAbW7yre0S-wvQF5+NznA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:22:35 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@...ellosystems.com>
To: David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: vxlan: fix crash when interface is created with
no group
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:47 PM, David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>From: David Miller
>
>>Any objections to this? I think it maintains the pre-ipv6-support
>>behavior. I know there may be some concerns about supporting
>>multiple
>>families on the same socket, but I'm not so sure the code is able to
>>support that right now anyways.
>
> I'm ok with the idea of determining the AF from the socket -- mixed
> support, if useful, can be added later. But the patch needs to then
> check and drop packets encapsulated with the wrong address family.
>
> And it still shouldn't assume !v4 means v6.
>
> [apologies for spacing; doing this from a web browser...]
> So, I think we need something like:
>
> if (vs->family == AF_INET && skb->protocol == ntohs(ETH_P_IP)) {
> ....
> } else if (vs->family == AF_INET6 && skb->protocol == ntohs(ETH_P_IPV6)) {
> ...
> } else
> goto drop
>
Checking skb->protocol will drop ARP requests. What about using
ip_hdr(skb)->version?
> +-DLS
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists