[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXkdrDKPcFmrBMovh4TWv2CwHUJ14YUhgKYLvwvw_rMhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:14:59 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...ts.codethink.co.uk,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sh_eth: ensure pm_runtime cannot suspend the device
during init
Hi Ben,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk> wrote:
> The pm_rumtime work queue is causing the device to be suspended during
> initialisation, thus the initialisation may not be able to access registers
> properly. As the code is called from a work queue, it is possible that this
> is not seen from certain configurations/builds due to the asynchronos
> nature of the code.
>
> Another issue has also been found where the network device registration
> calls back into the driver thus causing further pm_runtime calls that
> also caused issues with the MDIO bus code. This has now been checked
> and is the only place the MDIO can be called without the device open.
>
> Use pm_runtime_get_sync() and pm_runtime_put() to ensure that the
> pm system does not suspend it during the probe() call and remove the
> now unnecessary pm_runtime_resume() call. Also add a call in the error
> path to call pm_runtime_disable().
>
> This fixes the external abort that can cause /sbin/init or other such
> init processed to die.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Thanks, still works!
> ---
> Cc: sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
> Cc: laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com
> cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
>
> Note, Laurent this should probably be applied before your
> current series as it may require changes to the exit sequence.
I guess this should read:
" Fixed from v4:
- rebased on top of netdev-next"
?
> Fixes from v1:
> - use pm_runtime_put() over pm_runtime_put_sync() as
> we do not need to guaranteed the device has powered
> off after probe.
>
> Fixed from v2:
> - call pm_runtime_put() in error path
>
> Fixed from v3:
> - call pm_runtime_disable() in error path
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists