[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGVrzcb0=5qUwEPM-9LeMBU1gFL1UaZF5rzi0NXGPjMUfPDeLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 10:35:49 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: hisilicon: new hip04 ethernet driver
2014-03-24 10:23 GMT-07:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
> On Monday 24 March 2014 09:32:17 Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> > + priv->tx_skb[tx_head] = skb;
>> > + priv->tx_phys[tx_head] = phys;
>> > + desc->send_addr = cpu_to_be32(phys);
>> > + desc->send_size = cpu_to_be16(skb->len);
>> > + desc->cfg = cpu_to_be32(DESC_DEF_CFG);
>> > + phys = priv->tx_desc_dma + tx_head * sizeof(struct tx_desc);
>> > + desc->wb_addr = cpu_to_be32(phys);
>>
>> Don't we need a barrier here to ensure that all stores are completed
>> before we hand this descriptor address to hip40_set_xmit_desc() which
>> should make DMA start processing it?
>
> I would think the writel() in set_xmit_desc() implies the barrier.
Right, which means that this should be properly documented to make
sure that this simplification is well understood and produces the
expected result.
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists