[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53319BDF.9040001@citrix.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:08:15 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netback: fix race between napi_complete() and interrupt
handler
On 25/03/14 14:50, Wei Liu wrote:
> You forgot to target this patch to "net" tree in subject line.
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 02:08:25PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
>> When the NAPI budget was not all used, xenvif_poll() would call
>> napi_complete() /after/ enabling the interrupt. This resulted in a
>> race between the napi_complete() and the napi_schedule() in the
>> interrupt handler. The use of local_irq_save/restore() avoided by
>> race iff the handler is running on the same CPU but not if it was
>> running on a different CPU.
>>
>
> OK, I understand this issue now. You mentioned it in the other email
> which made me a bit confused.
>
> Just curious, how do you trigger this? By re-binding the interrupt to
> another CPU when xenvif_poll is running? I used to run irqbalance (the
> one that works with xen virtual interrupt) but could not trigger a race.
> Probably the race window is too small to trigger?
I haven't seen the race occur, but I've not tried to trigger it.
It may be that as Zoltan says, that the race is harmless but I still
think avoiding the race entirely is preferable.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists