netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140325.003146.1533027544821884786.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:31:46 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, roy.qing.li@...il.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 13:04:47 +1100

> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> net/core/netpoll.c between commit c27f0872a344 ("netpoll: fix the skb
> check in pkt_is_ns") from the net tree and commit 9c62a68d1311 ("netpoll:
> Remove dead packet receive code (CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP)") from the net-next
> tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the latter removes the code fixed by the former, so I did
> that) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).

That's a perfect resolution, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html