lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 22:31:30 +0100 From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>, dborkman <dborkman@...hat.com>, ogerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>, jesse <jesse@...ira.com>, pshelar <pshelar@...ira.com>, azhou <azhou@...ira.com>, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, vyasevic <vyasevic@...hat.com>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com>, Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>, Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@...ulusnetworks.com> Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 0/4] introduce infrastructure for support of switch chip datapath Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:27:05PM CET, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com wrote: >On 3/26/14, 11:03 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >>Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 06:47:15PM CET, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com wrote: >>>On 3/26/14, 9:59 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >>>>Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 05:54:17PM CET, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com wrote: >>>>>On 3/26/14, 3:54 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: >>>>>>On 03/26/14 01:37, Roopa Prabhu wrote: >>>>>>>On 3/25/14, 1:11 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>>>>>>>2014-03-25 12:35 GMT-07:00 Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>: >>>>>>>Sorry about getting on this thread late and possibly in the middle. >>>>>>>Agree on the idea of keeping the ports linked to the master switch dev >>>>>>>(or the 'conduit' to the switch chip) via private list instead of the >>>>>>>master-slave relationship proposed earlier. >>>>>>>By private i mean the netdev->priv linkage to the master switch dev and >>>>>>>not really keeping the ports from being exposed to the user. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>We think its better to keep the switch ports exposed as any other netdev >>>>>>>on linux. >>>>>>> This approach will make the switch ports look exactly like a nic port >>>>>>>and all tools will continue to work seamlessly. The switch port >>>>>>>operations could internally be forwarded to the switch netdev (sw1 in >>>>>>>the above case). >>>>>>> >>>>>>>example: >>>>>>>$ip link set dev sw1p0 up >>>>>>>$ethtool -S sw1p0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>I like the approach. I know the above is a simple version, but i am >>>>>>assuming you also mean i can do things like >>>>>>ip route add ... >>>>>>bridge fdb add ... (and if you like your brctl go ahead) >>>>>>bonding ... >>>>>> >>>>>yes, exactly. We support this model on our boxes today. >>>>>User can bond switch ports on our box in the exact same way as he/she >>>>>would bond two nic ports. >>>>>Our 'conduit to switch chip' reflects the corresponding lag >>>>>configuration in the switch chip. >>>>>Same goes for bridging, routing, acls. >>>>So you implement bonding netlink api? Or you hook into bonding driver >>>>itselt? Can you show us the code? >>>We use the netlink API and libnl. In our current model, our switch >>>chip driver listens to netlink notifications and programs the switch >>>chip. The switch chip driver uses libnl caches and libnl netlink apis >>>to reflect the kernel state to switch chip. >> >>So when you configure for example bonding over 2 ports, you actually use >>bonding driver to do that. And you userspace app listens to >>notifications and programs the switch chip accordingly. Am I close? >yes correct. >> >>How about data? Is this new "bonding" interface able to assign ip to is >>and send/receive packets. >yes >> >>I'm still not sure I understand your concept. Do you have some >>documentation for it available? >> >I think the only documentation available today in this area is the >user guide and that in-turn points to native linux command manpages >iproute2, sysfs, debian ifupdown etc. >I will see if i can find anything else. I ment the architecture design documentation. linux manpages are not that interesting to me :) > >thanks, >Roopa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists