[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D0F6E9407@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:55:46 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@...db.de>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
CC: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] net: hisilicon: new hip04 ethernet driver
From: Arnd Bergmann
> On Tuesday 25 March 2014 10:16:28 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >
> > Ok, well that's really unfortunate, to achieve the best of everything,
> > the workaround should probably look like:
> >
> > - keep reclaiming TX buffers in ndo_start_xmit() in case you push more
> > packets to the NICs than your timer can free
> > - reclaim TX buffers in NAPI poll() context for "symetrical" workloads
> > where e.g: TCP ACKs received allow you to complete TX buffers
> > - have a timer like you suggest which should help with transmit only
> > workloads at a slow rate
>
> Yes, that is what I was thinking, but with orphaning the tx skbs,
> we can probably be a little smarter. Note that in order to check
> the state of the queue, we have to do a read from uncached memory,
> since the hardware also doesn't support cache coherent DMA.
> We don't want to do that too often.
Possibly you can check for all the pending transmits having
completed - the most likely case. Instead of checking them
individually?
You should limit the number of tx bytes as well as the number
of tx frames - buffering a ring full of large frames subverts
some of the algorithms higher up the stack.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists