[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140325.204628.1622839093852736075.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:46:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hpa@...ux.intel.com
Cc: dborkman@...hat.com, ast@...mgrid.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
hagen@...u.net, keescook@...omium.org, pmoore@...hat.com,
mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] net: filter: rework/optimize internal
BPF interpreter's instruction set
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:24:27 -0700
> If you allow loops, it greatly increases the expressibility of the
> language, but we would really need another control to limit CPU usage.
We don't want super expressibility.
We want an extremely simple, trivial to validate, filtering language.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists