netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: unix: non blocking recvmsg() should not return -EINTR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ppl7ztez.fsf@sable.mobileactivedefense.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:02:12 +0000
From:	Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>
To:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: unix: non blocking recvmsg() should not return -EINTR

Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> writes:
> On 03/27/14 08:40, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> writes:
>>
>> I'm find with any behaviour which does not restore the original 'lost
>> wakeup' bug and considering that "it is a standard procedure to harras
>> people who are so careless to contribute bug fixes to Linux until the
>> cow comes home and they'd better be quiet about that!", as Mr Eric
>> "/dev/null" Dumasomething explained, I certainly don't plan to turn this
>> conviction of mine into a proper patch.
>
> I think anything you say past this point nobody is listening.

Why would I care if someone like you 'listens' to me?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html