[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <289461862.20140327144546@eikelenboom.it>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:45:46 +0100
From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
To: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>
CC: xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/3] xen-netback: remove pointless clause from if statement
Thursday, March 27, 2014, 1:56:11 PM, you wrote:
> This patch removes a test in start_new_rx_buffer() that checks whether
> a copy operation is less than MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET in length, since
> MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET is defined to be PAGE_SIZE and the only caller of
> start_new_rx_buffer() already limits copy operations to PAGE_SIZE or less.
> Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>
> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
> Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
> ---
> v2:
> - Add BUG_ON() as suggested by Ian Campbell
> drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> index 438d0c0..72314c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ static bool start_new_rx_buffer(int offset, unsigned long size, int head)
> * into multiple copies tend to give large frags their
> * own buffers as before.
> */
> - if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) &&
> - (size <= MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head)
> + BUG_ON(size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET);
> + if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head)
> return true;
>
> return false;
Hi Paul,
Unfortunately .. no good ..
With these patches (v2) applied to 3.14-rc8 it all seems to work well,
until i do my test case .. it still chokes and now effectively permanently stalls network traffic to that guest.
No error messages or anything in either xl dmesg or dmesg on the host .. and nothing in dmesg in the guest either.
But in the guest the TX bytes ifconfig reports for eth0 still increase but RX bytes does nothing, so it seems only the RX path is effected)
So it now seems i now have the situation which you described in the commit message from "ca2f09f2b2c6c25047cfc545d057c4edfcfe561c",
"Without this patch I can trivially stall netback permanently by just doing a large guest to guest file copy between two Windows Server 2008R2 VMs on a single host."
--
Sander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists