netdev - Re: [patch net-next RFC v2 0/6] introduce infrastructure for support of switch chip datapath

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140327140309.GD31168@tuxdriver.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:03:10 -0400
From:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, nhorman@...driver.com,
	andy@...yhouse.net, dborkman@...hat.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
	jesse@...ira.com, pshelar@...ira.com, azhou@...ira.com,
	ben@...adent.org.uk, stephen@...workplumber.org,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, vyasevic@...hat.com,
	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, john.r.fastabend@...el.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
	dev@...nvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC v2 0/6] introduce infrastructure for support
 of switch chip datapath

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:57:11PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:32:35PM CET, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:
> >On 03/27/14 08:00, Thomas Graf wrote:
> >
> >>It seems like we reached pretty good consensus on the model. What
> >>remaining issues do you see with the port model proposed in v2?
> >>
> >
> >Are we really following the same thread?
> >I dont see any rallying behind Jiri's approach from the
> >other folks who have their own code and way of approaching things.
> >I am hoping we dont continue with the split that is there
> >already.
> 
> It is not a split. It is just a completion of a model. Adding missing
> parts. At least I see it that way.

I probably wouldn't call it a 'split' either.  But, I agree with
Jamal that we are nowhere near consensus so far.

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@...driver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html