lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 10:03:10 -0400
From:	"John W. Linville" <>
To:	Jiri Pirko <>
Cc:	Jamal Hadi Salim <>, Thomas Graf <>,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC v2 0/6] introduce infrastructure for support
 of switch chip datapath

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:57:11PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:32:35PM CET, wrote:
> >On 03/27/14 08:00, Thomas Graf wrote:
> >
> >>It seems like we reached pretty good consensus on the model. What
> >>remaining issues do you see with the port model proposed in v2?
> >>
> >
> >Are we really following the same thread?
> >I dont see any rallying behind Jiri's approach from the
> >other folks who have their own code and way of approaching things.
> >I am hoping we dont continue with the split that is there
> >already.
> It is not a split. It is just a completion of a model. Adding missing
> parts. At least I see it that way.

I probably wouldn't call it a 'split' either.  But, I agree with
Jamal that we are nowhere near consensus so far.

John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you			might be all we have.  Be ready.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists