netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix stmmac-socfpga allmodconfig breakage in arm-soc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4983643.yPXNcULbxi@wuerfel>
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2014 01:29:40 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@...il.com>, dinguyen@...era.com,
	mark.rutland@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	pawel.moll@....com, srinivas.kandagatla@...com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, arm@...nel.org, galak@...eaurora.org,
	peppe.cavallaro@...com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix stmmac-socfpga allmodconfig breakage in arm-soc

On Wednesday 26 March 2014 19:05:13 Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On 03/26/2014 04:54 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 March 2014, dinguyen@...era.com wrote:
> >> From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...era.com>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> These 3 patches are based on Arnd's patch to fix the allmodconfig for the
> >> dwmac-socfpga implementation. I just broke the patch out into drivers,
> >> dts, and dts documentation.
> >>
> >> The original patch is here:
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/241518.html
> >>
> >> Arnd mentioned that he was thinking about just removing the dwmac-socfpga
> >> and send out the new verion to the netdev tree, but I haven't seen it. So
> >> just in case this solution might work, here are the patches.
> >>
> >> These patches are based on arm-soc/for-next.
> >
> > Hi Dinh,
> >
> > Thanks for putting these patches together. The problem I see with these
> > is that we have multiple conflicts between my changes and the other
> > patches that went into the netdev tree.
> >
> > Originally, the idea was that David Miller gave his Ack to have
> > the patches merged through arm-soc, but I think that was a mistake,
> > and they should have been treated like the other patches for
> > the same driver, i.e. put the driver and binding changes into
> > netdev, and the dt changes into arm-soc.
> >
> > If I apply your patches on top of the next/drivers branch, we get
> > conflicts for a handful of files, and get Linus to resolve them.
> > I tried applying my patch on Sunday, but backed it out because
> > of this.
> >
> > My preferred solution at this point would be to revert the driver
> > addition in the arm-soc tree and have David put the new version
> > in, but I don't know if he still takes patches like that for 3.15.
> >
> 
> That's fine. Do you mind if I send out a fresh patch based on the netdev 
> tree? If there is still for 3.15, otherwise, going for 3.16 is fine.

Sounds good. I've reverted the two patches (driver addition, and
binding addition plus dts changes) in arm-soc/next/drivers now.

Please submit the updated versions to netdev, but split out the
dts changes into a patch that we can take through arm-soc.

I'll send an Ack when I see your patches.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html