[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1395896080-7926-10-git-send-email-ying.xue@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:54:38 +0800
From: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <jon.maloy@...csson.com>, <Paul.Gortmaker@...driver.com>,
<erik.hugne@...csson.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 09/10] tipc: use node_list_lock to protect tipc_num_nodes variable
As tipc_node_list is protected by rcu read lock on read side, it's
unnecessary to hold node_list_lock to protect tipc_node_list in
tipc_node_get_links(). Instead, node_list_lock should just protects
tipc_num_nodes in the function.
Signed-off-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@...csson.com>
Reviewed-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
---
net/tipc/node.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/tipc/node.c b/net/tipc/node.c
index 4f517ff..85405a6 100644
--- a/net/tipc/node.c
+++ b/net/tipc/node.c
@@ -352,11 +352,11 @@ struct sk_buff *tipc_node_get_nodes(const void *req_tlv_area, int req_tlv_space)
return tipc_cfg_reply_error_string(TIPC_CFG_NOT_SUPPORTED
" (too many nodes)");
}
+ spin_unlock_bh(&node_list_lock);
+
buf = tipc_cfg_reply_alloc(payload_size);
- if (!buf) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&node_list_lock);
+ if (!buf)
return NULL;
- }
/* Add TLVs for all nodes in scope */
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -369,7 +369,6 @@ struct sk_buff *tipc_node_get_nodes(const void *req_tlv_area, int req_tlv_space)
&node_info, sizeof(node_info));
}
rcu_read_unlock();
- spin_unlock_bh(&node_list_lock);
return buf;
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists