[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1395896080-7926-1-git-send-email-ying.xue@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:54:29 +0800
From: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <jon.maloy@...csson.com>, <Paul.Gortmaker@...driver.com>,
<erik.hugne@...csson.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 00/10] clean up bearer and node layer
This is another commit series which aims at facilitating future
changes to the locking policy around nodes, links and bearers.
Currently, the tipc routing hierarchy comprises the structures 'node',
'link' and 'bearer'. The whole hierarchy is protected by a big
read/write lock (tipc_net_lock), to ensure that nothing is added or
removed while any of these structures is being accessed. Obviously
the locking policy makes node, link and bearer components closely
bound together so that their relationship becomes extremely complex.
In the worst case, such locking policy not only has a negative
influence on performance, but also it's prone to lead to deadlock
occasionally.
In order to decouple the complex relationship between bearer and node
as well as link, the locking policy is adjusted as follows:
- Bearer level
RTNL lock is used on update side, and RCU is used on read side.
Meanwhile, all bearer instances including broadcast bearer are
saved into bearer_list array.
- Node and link level
All node instances are saved into two tipc_node_list and node_htable
lists. The two lists are protected by node_list_lock on write side,
and they are guarded with RCU lock on read side. All members in node
structure including link instances are protected by node spin lock.
- The relationship between bearer and node
When link accesses bearer, it first needs to find the bearer with
its bearer identity from the bearer_list array. When bearer accesses
node, it can iterate the node_htable hash list with the node address
to find the corresponding node.
In the new locking policy, every component has its private locking
solution and the relationship between bearer and node is very simple,
that is, they can find each other with node address or bearer identity
from node_htable hash list or bearer_list array.
But, prior to these changes, we need to do some necessary cleanup and
code consolidation. This is what we do with this commit series. In a
later series we will replace net_lock with RTNL as well as RCU lock
to deploy the new locking policy.
Ying Xue (10):
tipc: remove unnecessary checking for node object
tipc: obsolete the remote management feature
tipc: acquire necessary locks in named_cluster_distribute routine
tipc: convert tipc_bearers array to pointer list
tipc: remove active flag from tipc_bearer structure
tipc: make broadcast bearer store in bearer_list array
tipc: rename node create lock to protect node list and hlist
tipc: tipc: convert node list and node hlist to RCU lists
tipc: use node_list_lock to protect tipc_num_nodes variable
tipc: use node list lock to protect tipc_num_links variable
net/tipc/bcast.c | 13 +++---
net/tipc/bearer.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++------
net/tipc/bearer.h | 4 +-
net/tipc/config.c | 107 ++-----------------------------------------------
net/tipc/config.h | 5 ---
net/tipc/core.c | 9 -----
net/tipc/core.h | 1 -
net/tipc/link.c | 20 ++++-----
net/tipc/name_distr.c | 16 ++++++--
net/tipc/net.c | 9 ++---
net/tipc/node.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
net/tipc/node.h | 6 ++-
12 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 217 deletions(-)
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists