[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140328074110.GC11063@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:41:10 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Wangyufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ioe@...ches.com,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] ipv6: reuse rt6_need_strict
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:01:42PM +0800, Wangyufen wrote:
> From: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
>
> Modify the rt6_need_strict, so that it can be reused
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
> ---
> include/net/ip6_route.h | 1 +
> net/ipv6/route.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/ip6_route.h b/include/net/ip6_route.h
> index 00e3f12..d9c316e 100644
> --- a/include/net/ip6_route.h
> +++ b/include/net/ip6_route.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ static inline unsigned int rt6_flags2srcprefs(int flags)
> return (flags >> 3) & 7;
> }
>
> +bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr);
>
> void ip6_route_input(struct sk_buff *skb);
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index fba54a4..f5fdccc 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static bool rt6_check_expired(const struct rt6_info *rt)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr)
> +bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr)
> {
> return ipv6_addr_type(daddr) &
> (IPV6_ADDR_MULTICAST | IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL | IPV6_ADDR_LOOPBACK);
Just a small suggestion:
I think we can move the whole function as static inline into the header.
Thanks,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists