[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9AAE0902D5BC7E449B7C8E4E778ABCD029E21D@AMSPEX01CL01.citrite.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:44:12 +0000
From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2 1/3] xen-netback: remove pointless
clause from if statement
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Laight [mailto:David.Laight@...LAB.COM]
> Sent: 28 March 2014 10:36
> To: Paul Durrant; Sander Eikelenboom
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Wei Liu; Ian Campbell; xen-devel@...ts.xen.org
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net v2 1/3] xen-netback: remove pointless
> clause from if statement
>
> From: Paul Durrant
> > > A reasonable high estimate for the number of slots required for a specific
> > > message is 'frag_count + total_size/4096'.
> > > So if that are that many slots free it is definitely ok to add the message.
> > >
> >
> > Hmm, that may work. By total_size, I assume you mean skb->len, so that
> calculation is based on an
> > overhead of 1 non-optimally packed slot per frag. There'd still need to be a
> +1 for the GSO 'extra'
> > though.
>
> Except I meant '2 * frag_count + size/4096' :-(
>
And that's the pessimal estimation that's failing for Sander :-(
Paul
> You have to assume that every fragment starts at n*4096-1 (so need
> at least two slots). A third slot is only needed for fragments
> longer that 1+4096+2 - but an extra one is needed for every
> 4096 bytes after that.
>
> David
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists