[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396006747-9113-2-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:39:05 +0000
From: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>
To: <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
Subject: [PATCH v3 net 1/3] xen-netback: remove pointless clause from if statement
This patch removes a test in start_new_rx_buffer() that checks whether
a copy operation is less than MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET in length, since
MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET is defined to be PAGE_SIZE and the only caller of
start_new_rx_buffer() already limits copy operations to PAGE_SIZE or less.
Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@...elenboom.it>
---
drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
index 438d0c0..72314c7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
@@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ static bool start_new_rx_buffer(int offset, unsigned long size, int head)
* into multiple copies tend to give large frags their
* own buffers as before.
*/
- if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) &&
- (size <= MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head)
+ BUG_ON(size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET);
+ if ((offset + size > MAX_BUFFER_OFFSET) && offset && !head)
return true;
return false;
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists