| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1396056451-5600-4-git-send-email-wangyufen@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:27:31 +0800
From: Wangyufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v6 3/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 policy route issue
From: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
The issue raises when adding policy route, specify a particular
NIC as oif, the policy route did not take effect. The reason is
that fl6.oif is not set and route map failed. From the
tcp_v6_send_response function, if the binding address is linklocal,
fl6.oif is set, but not for global address.
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
---
net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index 10b7c04..5ca56ce 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ static const struct tcp_request_sock_ops tcp_request_sock_ipv6_ops = {
#endif
static void tcp_v6_send_response(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 seq, u32 ack, u32 win,
- u32 tsval, u32 tsecr,
+ u32 tsval, u32 tsecr, int oif,
struct tcp_md5sig_key *key, int rst, u8 tclass,
u32 label)
{
@@ -798,8 +798,10 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_response(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 seq, u32 ack, u32 win,
__tcp_v6_send_check(buff, &fl6.saddr, &fl6.daddr);
fl6.flowi6_proto = IPPROTO_TCP;
- if (ipv6_addr_type(&fl6.daddr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL)
+ if (rt6_need_strict(&fl6.daddr) || !oif)
fl6.flowi6_oif = inet6_iif(skb);
+ else
+ fl6.flowi6_oif = oif;
fl6.fl6_dport = t1->dest;
fl6.fl6_sport = t1->source;
security_skb_classify_flow(skb, flowi6_to_flowi(&fl6));
@@ -833,6 +835,7 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_reset(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
int genhash;
struct sock *sk1 = NULL;
#endif
+ int oif;
if (th->rst)
return;
@@ -876,7 +879,8 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_reset(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
ack_seq = ntohl(th->seq) + th->syn + th->fin + skb->len -
(th->doff << 2);
- tcp_v6_send_response(skb, seq, ack_seq, 0, 0, 0, key, 1, 0, 0);
+ oif = sk ? sk->sk_bound_dev_if : 0;
+ tcp_v6_send_response(skb, seq, ack_seq, 0, 0, 0, oif, key, 1, 0, 0);
#ifdef CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG
release_sk1:
@@ -888,11 +892,11 @@ release_sk1:
}
static void tcp_v6_send_ack(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 seq, u32 ack,
- u32 win, u32 tsval, u32 tsecr,
+ u32 win, u32 tsval, u32 tsecr, int oif,
struct tcp_md5sig_key *key, u8 tclass,
u32 label)
{
- tcp_v6_send_response(skb, seq, ack, win, tsval, tsecr, key, 0, tclass,
+ tcp_v6_send_response(skb, seq, ack, win, tsval, tsecr, oif, key, 0, tclass,
label);
}
@@ -904,7 +908,7 @@ static void tcp_v6_timewait_ack(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
tcp_v6_send_ack(skb, tcptw->tw_snd_nxt, tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt,
tcptw->tw_rcv_wnd >> tw->tw_rcv_wscale,
tcp_time_stamp + tcptw->tw_ts_offset,
- tcptw->tw_ts_recent, tcp_twsk_md5_key(tcptw),
+ tcptw->tw_ts_recent, tw->tw_bound_dev_if, tcp_twsk_md5_key(tcptw),
tw->tw_tclass, (tw->tw_flowlabel << 12));
inet_twsk_put(tw);
@@ -914,7 +918,7 @@ static void tcp_v6_reqsk_send_ack(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct request_sock *req)
{
tcp_v6_send_ack(skb, tcp_rsk(req)->snt_isn + 1, tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1,
- req->rcv_wnd, tcp_time_stamp, req->ts_recent,
+ req->rcv_wnd, tcp_time_stamp, req->ts_recent, sk->sk_bound_dev_if,
tcp_v6_md5_do_lookup(sk, &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr),
0, 0);
}
--
1.7.12
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists