lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396105350.21428.6.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Sat, 29 Mar 2014 08:02:30 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] packet: respect devices with LLTX flag in
 direct xmit

On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 22:13 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 03/28/2014 09:50 PM, David Miller wrote:

> > The only remaining issue is that Eric seems to suggest that a tx
> > dropped counter bump should be added.  Please submit that as a
> > follow-on if my reading of his feedback is accurate.
> 
> Yes, will do next week. I think at time of submission we didn't
> have that yet. :)

BTW, how direct xmit performs in case of BQL enabled driver ?

dummy is nice, but not really representative of real device ;)

netif_xmit_frozen_or_stopped() tests (dev_queue->state &
QUEUE_STATE_ANY_XOFF_OR_FROZEN), so will not fill TX ring.

Since you have no queue, I would rather use a test without
BQL bit (1 << __QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF), so that you can absorb bursts
into TX ring ...

 include/linux/netdevice.h |   21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 net/packet/af_packet.c    |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 159c7e7945f8..ed71a2cc1f66 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -526,11 +526,15 @@ enum netdev_queue_state_t {
 	__QUEUE_STATE_DRV_XOFF,
 	__QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF,
 	__QUEUE_STATE_FROZEN,
-#define QUEUE_STATE_ANY_XOFF ((1 << __QUEUE_STATE_DRV_XOFF)		| \
-			      (1 << __QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF))
-#define QUEUE_STATE_ANY_XOFF_OR_FROZEN (QUEUE_STATE_ANY_XOFF		| \
-					(1 << __QUEUE_STATE_FROZEN))
 };
+#define QUEUE_STATE_DRV_XOFF	(1 << __QUEUE_STATE_DRV_XOFF)
+#define QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF	(1 << __QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF)
+#define QUEUE_STATE_FROZEN	(1 << __QUEUE_STATE_FROZEN)
+
+#define QUEUE_STATE_ANY_XOFF	(QUEUE_STATE_DRV_XOFF | QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF)
+#define QUEUE_STATE_ANY_XOFF_OR_FROZEN (QUEUE_STATE_ANY_XOFF | \
+					QUEUE_STATE_FROZEN)
+
 /*
  * __QUEUE_STATE_DRV_XOFF is used by drivers to stop the transmit queue.  The
  * netif_tx_* functions below are used to manipulate this flag.  The
@@ -2262,11 +2266,18 @@ static inline bool netif_xmit_stopped(const struct netdev_queue *dev_queue)
 	return dev_queue->state & QUEUE_STATE_ANY_XOFF;
 }
 
-static inline bool netif_xmit_frozen_or_stopped(const struct netdev_queue *dev_queue)
+static inline bool
+netif_xmit_frozen_or_stopped(const struct netdev_queue *dev_queue)
 {
 	return dev_queue->state & QUEUE_STATE_ANY_XOFF_OR_FROZEN;
 }
 
+static inline bool
+netif_xmit_frozen_or_drv_stopped(const struct netdev_queue *dev_queue)
+{
+	return dev_queue->state & (QUEUE_STATE_FROZEN | QUEUE_STATE_DRV_XOFF);
+}
+
 static inline void netdev_tx_sent_queue(struct netdev_queue *dev_queue,
 					unsigned int bytes)
 {
diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
index 01039d2b1695..c8d50690b619 100644
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int packet_direct_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	local_bh_disable();
 
 	HARD_TX_LOCK(dev, txq, smp_processor_id());
-	if (!netif_xmit_frozen_or_stopped(txq)) {
+	if (!netif_xmit_frozen_or_drv_stopped(txq)) {
 		ret = ops->ndo_start_xmit(skb, dev);
 		if (ret == NETDEV_TX_OK)
 			txq_trans_update(txq);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ