[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396290285.2158.2.camel@jtkirshe-mobl.jf.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:24:45 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next v2 07/14] i40evf: remove double space after return
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 21:18 +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Jesse Brandeburg
> <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:58:31 +0300
> > Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com> wrote:
> >> Just out of curiosity, any special reason for four of the maintainers
> >> to sign on a patch that remove a space?
> >
> > Yeah, seems like lots of overkill, in this case it is just an artifact
> > of all the people that handled the patch as it exited our process.
> >
> > Thanks for the review.
>
> So beinh curios again, are you planning to change something based on
> this feedback and your overkill comment?
Yeah, I will ensure that patches I send out won't have an overkill of
signatures. I saw this when I went to push it upstream and thought
twice about trimming down the list. I plan on keeping the author,
tested-by and my signatures on the patch for sure.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists