[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1396388550-23081-10-git-send-email-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 23:42:23 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 09/16] can: c_can: Fix the lost message handling
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
The lost message handling is broken in several ways.
1) Clearing the message lost flag is done by writing 0 to the
message control register of the object.
#define IF_MCONT_CLR_MSGLST (0 << 14)
That clears the object buffer configuration in the worst case,
which results in a loss of the EOB flag. That leaves the FIFO chain
without a limit and causes a complete lockup of the HW
2) In case that the error skb allocation fails, the code happily
claims that it handed down a packet. Just an accounting bug, but ....
3) The code adds a lot of pointless overhead to that error case, where
we need to get stuff done as fast as possible to avoid more packet
loss.
- printk an annoying error message
- reread the object buffer for nothing
Fix is simple again:
- Use the already known MSGCTRL content and only clear the MSGLST bit
- Fix the buffer accounting by adding a proper return code
- Remove the pointless operations
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
index cef9967..ef5f3b8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c
@@ -122,7 +122,6 @@
/* IFx message control */
#define IF_MCONT_NEWDAT BIT(15)
#define IF_MCONT_MSGLST BIT(14)
-#define IF_MCONT_CLR_MSGLST (0 << 14)
#define IF_MCONT_INTPND BIT(13)
#define IF_MCONT_UMASK BIT(12)
#define IF_MCONT_TXIE BIT(11)
@@ -411,27 +410,22 @@ static inline void c_can_activate_rx_msg_obj(struct net_device *dev,
c_can_object_put(dev, iface, obj, IF_COMM_CONTROL);
}
-static void c_can_handle_lost_msg_obj(struct net_device *dev,
- int iface, int objno)
+static int c_can_handle_lost_msg_obj(struct net_device *dev,
+ int iface, int objno, u32 ctrl)
{
- struct c_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
struct net_device_stats *stats = &dev->stats;
- struct sk_buff *skb;
+ struct c_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
struct can_frame *frame;
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
- netdev_err(dev, "msg lost in buffer %d\n", objno);
-
- c_can_object_get(dev, iface, objno, IF_COMM_ALL & ~IF_COMM_TXRQST);
-
- priv->write_reg(priv, C_CAN_IFACE(MSGCTRL_REG, iface),
- IF_MCONT_CLR_MSGLST);
-
+ ctrl &= ~(IF_MCONT_MSGLST | IF_MCONT_INTPND | IF_MCONT_NEWDAT);
+ priv->write_reg(priv, C_CAN_IFACE(MSGCTRL_REG, iface), ctrl);
c_can_object_put(dev, iface, objno, IF_COMM_CONTROL);
/* create an error msg */
skb = alloc_can_err_skb(dev, &frame);
if (unlikely(!skb))
- return;
+ return 0;
frame->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
frame->data[1] = CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_OVERFLOW;
@@ -439,6 +433,7 @@ static void c_can_handle_lost_msg_obj(struct net_device *dev,
stats->rx_over_errors++;
netif_receive_skb(skb);
+ return 1;
}
static int c_can_read_msg_object(struct net_device *dev, int iface, int ctrl)
@@ -910,9 +905,13 @@ static int c_can_do_rx_poll(struct net_device *dev, int quota)
C_CAN_IFACE(MSGCTRL_REG, IF_RX));
if (msg_ctrl_save & IF_MCONT_MSGLST) {
- c_can_handle_lost_msg_obj(dev, IF_RX, msg_obj);
- num_rx_pkts++;
- quota--;
+ int n;
+
+ n = c_can_handle_lost_msg_obj(dev, IF_RX,
+ msg_obj,
+ msg_ctrl_save);
+ num_rx_pkts += n;
+ quota -=n;
continue;
}
--
1.9.0.279.gdc9e3eb
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists