lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 17:55:51 +0900 From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com> To: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg> Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: reflect the fwmark for replies with no socket On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg> wrote: > sysctl looks better to me. For example, > ip_reply_fwmark(net, fwmark) that will return 0 or > fwmark depending on net->ipv4.sysctl_reply_fwmark boolean. > Similar for ip6_reply_fwmark() and net->ipv6.sysctl_reply_fwmark. > You can select the right names. Ack. I'll shortly post a patch that does this. It uses one per-namespace sysctl - net.ipv4.fwmark_reflect - for both IPv4 and IPv6. Using only one sysctl is consistent with things like ping and tcp, and it marginally shortens the code, but I can change this to two if desired. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists