netdev - Re: question: update_pmtu doesn't update dst mtu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Apr 2014 16:07:21 +0400
From:	"Ilya V. Matveychikov" <i.matveychikov@...uritycode.ru>
To:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: question: update_pmtu doesn't update dst mtu

On 03.04.2014 15:58, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 03:37:33PM +0400, Ilya V. Matveychikov wrote:
>> Looking through the code gives me that rt_pmtu is always 0 for the skb->dst
>> entry and ipv4_mtu that called via the dst->ops->mtu() uses dev->mtu :(
> 
> At this point you have to drop skb_dst and have to relookup the route. During
> that a new dst will be created which gets the mtu value from the next hop
> exception, which got created by update_pmtu.
> 
> Normally routes are checked with dst_check if they are still valid
> and a relookup should happen. In your example just do the relookup
> unconditionally.
> 

Does it mean that the next packet must have an updated route without any
problems? I meant that if the first packet xmitting leads to updating the route
PMTU via the exception creating (or updating) so the next packets must have an
updated route? Am I right?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html