netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: sched: dev_deactivate_many(): use msleep(1) instead of yield() to wait for outstanding qdisc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Apr 2014 13:19:06 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, ben@...adent.org.uk,
	mkl@...gutronix.de, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: dev_deactivate_many(): use msleep(1) instead
 of yield() to wait for outstanding qdisc_run callsb

On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:26:28AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 17:19:42 +0200
> 
> > The proper way to fix the dev_deactivate_many() is to use wait_event(),
> > polling for that state is just daft. Afaict there is no reason the qdisc
> > code could not do a wakeup whenever that condition changes.
> 
> I actually looked into this, and it's going to add expensive checks
> to the fast paths of packet processing.
> 
> If it was so easy we'd be doing it that way already.

Fair enough; and I suppose this waiting side is 'rare' compared to the
packet processing side of things?

In that case you could add a comment with the msleep() and just leave it
at that I suppose.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html