[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140407.200535.1263628364222611722.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 20:05:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fw@...len.de
Cc: tobias@...ongswan.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, mleitner@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Problems with fragments since gso skb forwarding changes in
virtual environment
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 01:46:40 +0200
> Looking at br_nf_dev_queue_xmit() in br_netfilter.c I see that it has
> a bug (not related 'gso skbs in forwarding path' change): it assumes
> that if skb->nfct is NULL no reassembly has taken place. Thats not
> true (can load ipv4 defrag module without ipv4 conntrack one), or
> netfilter defragmented the packet but then protocol tracker returned
> error ('INVALID' conntrack state in netfilter speak).
>
> I admit its rare condition, but afaics br_nf_dev_queue_xmit is
> supposed to re-fragment packets that have been subject to defrag.
In fact, judging by commits:
commit e179e6322ac334e21a3c6d669d95bc967e5d0a80
Author: Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@...dora.be>
Date: Thu Apr 15 12:26:39 2010 +0200
netfilter: bridge-netfilter: Fix MAC header handling with IP DNAT
and subsequently:
commit c197facc8ea08062f8f949aade6a33649ee06771
Author: hummerbliss@...il.com <hummerbliss@...il.com>
Date: Mon Apr 20 17:12:35 2009 +0200
netfilter: bridge: allow fragmentation of VLAN packets traversing a bridge
I would say that we should simply remove the skb->nfct check
altogether and everything will work fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists