netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] net: sctp: wake up all assocs if sndbuf policy is per socket

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140408.141918.1353780924646899277.davem@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 08 Apr 2014 14:19:18 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
To:	dborkman@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, tgraf@...g.ch,
	nhorman@...driver.com, vyasevic@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: sctp: wake up all assocs if sndbuf policy
 is per socket

From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 19:20:16 +0200

> On 04/08/2014 07:18 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
>> Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 18:57:06 +0200
>>
>>> Hm, I still found an issue, please hold on with this one, thanks.
>>
>> Ugh too late I pushed it out, you'll need to send a relative fix.
> 
> No problem, will do, thanks. I suggest to take it out from
> the stable queue for now. Sorry for any inconvenience.

I'm going to keep it in there and add the fixup when you submit it,
I'll make a mental note not to apply it until the fixup is in too.

I always re-read all of the discussion in the patchwork entry for
a patch when I backport it to -stable, so it's very unlikely that
I will accidently apply it without the fixup.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html