netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] net: sctp: wake up all assocs if sndbuf policy is per socket

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 08 Apr 2014 21:04:33 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, tgraf@...g.ch,
	nhorman@...driver.com, vyasevic@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: sctp: wake up all assocs if sndbuf policy
 is per socket

On 04/08/2014 08:46 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> Daniel and Vlad, I'm about to send Linus a pull request.
>
> I know that you still need to fixup this SCTP change and it'll be
> in there, but I really need to get the changes in my tree staged
> so that I can do a set of -stable submissions.
>
> So please don't freak out, I know that this change still needs work
> and shouldn't go to -stable just yet :-)

Noted, thanks. I think the issue is that in sctp_association_free()
we do a list_del(&asoc->asocs) and then flush sctp_outq_free() which
will then access on sctp_wfree() a poisoned entry. I think this
should be list_del_init() instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html