lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 09 Apr 2014 09:32:31 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <>
To:	Heikki Krogerus <>,
	Johannes Berg <>
CC:	Chen-Yu Tsai <>, Rhyland Klein <>,
	Marc Dietrich <>,
	Linus Walleij <>,
	Arnd Bergmann <>,
	Alexandre Courbot <>,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/5] net: rfkill: gpio: cleanup and a few new acpi ids

On 04/09/2014 04:01 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:37:55AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 17:02 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>>> I hope this one is OK with everyone.
>> It's fine with me. Are you expecting me to pick up any of these patches,
>> or do you want them to go through some other tree? Either way is fine
>> with me, but the first patch looks like something I probably shouldn't
>> be taking.
> The second patch depends on it.
> Stephen! Are you expecting any changes to board-paz00.c in this kernel
> cycle? If not, I think it would be easiest if Johannes, you take the
> whole set. What do you guys think?

I can't predict the future, but the chances are pretty slim - that file
is pretty tiny and doesn't have much churn.

The best approach is to put this series in its own topic branch. Then,
if any conflict does come up, I can simply merge the branch into the
Tegra treee and apply the conflicting patches on top.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists