[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53465641.4070407@securitycode.ru>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:28:49 +0400
From: "Ilya V. Matveychikov" <i.matveychikov@...uritycode.ru>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: question: update_pmtu doesn't update dst mtu
On 10.04.2014 00:30, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 12:17:33PM +0400, Ilya V. Matveychikov wrote:
>> Works fine, thanks! By the way, could you briefly explain why routes are
>> separated to input and output? What are the benefits?
>
> Core routing table is not split by input and output, merely the dst
> construction and surrounding lookup and policy checks are seperated for input
> and output.
>
> Output does not have to deal with source address validation e.g. but has to do
> source address selection.
>
> Quite hard to answer, I guess the design emerged quite naturally. ;)
OK, I've got it. Thanks again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists