lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1397331172.4222.8.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:32:52 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Sharat Masetty <sharat04@...il.com>
Cc:	chptx y <chptxy@...il.com>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What causes these TCP packet getting lost in linux kernel

On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 12:35 -0600, Sharat Masetty wrote:
> Check /proc/net/netstat and /proc/net/snmp
> 
> In netstat look for
> 
> LINUX_MIB_TCPOFODROP and LINUX_MIB_BACKLOGDROP

The packet is not out of order, according to tcpdump.

Note that the receiver reacts to incoming packet, sending a DUPACK, so
its not a backlogdrop.

tcpdump trace is really incomplete, I asked tcpdump -vv but got nothing
from chptx, assuming this is a real name.

packet might be rejected because of a zero receiver window, who knows.

I might search in my basement this crystal ball I might have.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ