netdev - Re: [PATCH] seccomp: fix populating a0-a5 syscall args in 32-bit x86 BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140414.162452.1169041476405438694.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:24:52 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	luto@...capital.net
Cc:	dborkman@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	ast@...mgrid.com, eparis@...hat.com, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
	keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: fix populating a0-a5 syscall args in 32-bit
 x86 BPF

From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:13:45 -0700

> I think this description is wrong.  (unsigned long *) &sd->args[1] is
> the right location, at least on 32-bit little-endian architectures.

It absolutely is not.

The thing is a u64, and we must respect that type in a completely
portable way.

Daniel's change is %100 correct, portable, and doesn't have any
ugly ifdef crap.

If you want to optimize this, and potentially break it again, do
it in the next merge window not now.

I'm going to apply Daniel's patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html