lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:04:04 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, xeb@...l.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ip6_gre: don't allow to remove the fb_tunnel_dev

From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:11:38 +0200

> It's possible to remove the FB tunnel with the command 'ip link del ip6gre0' but
> this is unsafe, the module always supposes that this device exists. For example,
> ip6gre_tunnel_lookup() may use it unconditionally.
> 
> Let's add a rtnl handler for dellink, which will never remove the FB tunnel (we
> let ip6gre_destroy_tunnels() do the job).
> 
> Introduced by commit c12b395a4664 ("gre: Support GRE over IPv6").
> 
> CC: Dmitry Kozlov <xeb@...l.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>

I don't see how we ever get rid of fb_tunnel_dev and can therefore
remove the module successfully.

It is created by the per-netns initialization, but since it isn't
added to the hashes I don't see how the per-netns exit code can
end up unregistering and freeing it up.

How is this supposed to work?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists