netdev - Re: Re:Re: How to set the filtering rules for drop the packets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1398189927.7767.83.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:05:27 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	mstian88 <mstian88@....com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re:Re: How to set the filtering rules for drop the packets

On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 12:56 +0800, mstian88 wrote:
> thanks for your reply , 
> 
>  my NIC is intel X540-T1, when i set dst-port filter first ,suceess,
> but then set src-port filter failed。
> 
> That is to say the filter rule src-port and dis-port can't set
> together。

So you can insert either filter individually, but not both?  How odd.
You could ask the ixgbe maintainers whether this is a real hardware
limitation or a bug.

> There are any other ways to filter the packets that srcport is 80 or
> dstport is 80?

You can do it in software with netfilter/iptables.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. - Leonard Brandwein

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)