[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1398253309.7767.136.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:41:49 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: zhuyj <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, joe@...ches.com, julia.lawall@...6.fr,
dingtianhong@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jasowang@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com,
"Yang, Zhangle (Eric)" <Zhangle.Yang@...driver.com>,
"Wu, Kuaikuai" <Kuaikuai.Wu@...driver.com>,
"Tao, Yue" <Yue.Tao@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: in kernel 2.6.x, tun/tap nic supports vlan packets
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 15:48 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
> On 04/23/2014 01:53 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> > For what it's worth, I would recommend against applying this. I don't
> > think even Red Hat has backported the VLAN changes, and they have been
> > quite aggressive about backporting features to RHEL 6.
> If we do not merge these patches, maybe RHEL 6 can not make tap driver
> support vlan well.
RHEL 6 isn't based on 2.6.32.y, they do all their own backporting.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers. - Leonard Brandwein
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists