netdev - Re: [PATCH net] bridge: Handle IFLA_ADDRESS correctly when creating bridge device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAG-2HqUhT+vbZfugfTYGzWt_qu45sKMaWXQ0uNg8SPzYNmG_5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:04:12 +0200
From:	Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>
To:	Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	bridge <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"C. R. Oldham" <cr@...tstack.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: Handle IFLA_ADDRESS correctly when creating
 bridge device

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Toshiaki Makita
<makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> When bridge device is created with IFLA_ADDRESS, we are not calling
> br_stp_change_bridge_id(), which leads to incorrect local fdb
> management and bridge id calculation, and prevents us from receiving
> frames on the bridge device.
>
> Reported-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>

Thanks. That looks correct to me (not able to test at the moment
though). Would this be appropriate for stable if it goes in?

Cheers,

Tom

> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> index e74b6d53..a8b664e 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> @@ -445,6 +445,25 @@ static int br_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static int br_dev_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
> +                         struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
> +{
> +       int err;
> +       struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +       if (tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]) {
> +               spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
> +               br_stp_change_bridge_id(br, nla_data(tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]));
> +               spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
> +       }
> +
> +       err = register_netdevice(dev);
> +       if (err)
> +               return err;
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static size_t br_get_link_af_size(const struct net_device *dev)
>  {
>         struct net_port_vlans *pv;
> @@ -473,6 +492,7 @@ struct rtnl_link_ops br_link_ops __read_mostly = {
>         .priv_size      = sizeof(struct net_bridge),
>         .setup          = br_dev_setup,
>         .validate       = br_validate,
> +       .newlink        = br_dev_newlink,
>         .dellink        = br_dev_delete,
>  };
>
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html